{"id":100068,"date":"2023-07-24T08:58:14","date_gmt":"2023-07-24T06:58:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/elena-gualco-united-in-diversitybut-please-put-your-headscarf-away-the-cjeu-religious-discrimination-and-member-states-gasp-for-neutrality\/"},"modified":"2023-07-26T11:10:42","modified_gmt":"2023-07-26T09:10:42","slug":"elena-gualco-united-in-diversitybut-please-put-your-headscarf-away-the-cjeu-religious-discrimination-and-member-states-gasp-for-neutrality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/elena-gualco-united-in-diversitybut-please-put-your-headscarf-away-the-cjeu-religious-discrimination-and-member-states-gasp-for-neutrality\/","title":{"rendered":"ELENA GUALCO, United in diversity\u2026but please put your headscarf away: the CJEU, religious discrimination and Member States\u2019 gasp for neutrality"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>ABSTRACT &#8211; This contribution investigates two recent disputes that have led and will lead the Court of justice of the EU to further clarify the thresholds and boundaries of religious discrimination. Within the analysis of the CJEU\u2019s ruling in LF v S.C.R.L. and of the Advocate General\u2019s Opinion in OP v Commune d\u2019Ans, the author focuses on the shortcomings of the CJEU\u2019s approach allowing Member States and individuals a broad discretion when pursuing \u2018neutrality in the workplace\u2019 and highlights how this approach ultimately affects the substantive reach of equality in the workplace.    <\/p>\n\n\t\t<div class=\"wppdfemb-frame-container-1\" style=\"-webkit-overflow-scrolling:auto;\">\n\t\t\t<iframe class=\"pdfembed-iframe nonfullscreen wppdf-emb-iframe-1\"\n\t\t\t\tsrc=\"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/?pdfemb-data=eyJwZGZJRCI6MTAwMDY1LCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczpcL1wvd3d3LmFpc2R1ZS5ldVwvd3AtY29udGVudFwvdXBsb2Fkc1wvMjAyM1wvMDdcL0d1YWxjby1CbG9nRFVFLnBkZiIsInRpdGxlIjoiR3VhbGNvLUJsb2dEVUUiLCJpbmRleCI6MSwid21fdGV4dCI6IiJ9\"\n\t\t\t\ttitle=\"Gualco-BlogDUE\"\t\t\t\tdata-pdf-id=\"100065\"\n\t\t\t\tdata-pdf-index=\"1\"\n\t\t\t\tstyle=\"border:none;width:100%;max-width:100%;height:100vh;\"\n\t\t\t\tscrolling=\"yes\">\n\t\t\t<\/iframe>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\n<p class=\"wp-block-pdfemb-pdf-embedder-viewer\"><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Gualco-BlogDUE.pdf\">DOWNLOAD IN FORMATO PDF<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT &#8211; This contribution investigates two recent disputes that have led and will lead the Court of justice of the EU to further clarify the thresholds and boundaries of religious discrimination. Within the analysis of the CJEU\u2019s ruling in LF v S.C.R.L. and of the Advocate General\u2019s Opinion in OP v Commune d\u2019Ans, the author focuses on the shortcomings of the CJEU\u2019s approach allowing Member States and individuals a broad discretion when pursuing \u2018neutrality in the workplace\u2019 and highlights how this approach ultimately affects the substantive reach of equality in the workplace.    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":97108,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_piecal_is_event":false,"_piecal_start_date":"","_piecal_end_date":"","_piecal_is_allday":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1109],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogdue-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100068"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100068\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100069,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100068\/revisions\/100069"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/97108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}