{"id":102260,"date":"2024-03-24T17:20:43","date_gmt":"2024-03-24T16:20:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/marco-fisicaro-the-krajowa-rada-sadownictwa-judgment-and-the-different-faces-of-judicial-independence-in-eu-law\/"},"modified":"2024-03-24T18:09:03","modified_gmt":"2024-03-24T17:09:03","slug":"marco-fisicaro-the-krajowa-rada-sadownictwa-judgment-and-the-different-faces-of-judicial-independence-in-eu-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/marco-fisicaro-the-krajowa-rada-sadownictwa-judgment-and-the-different-faces-of-judicial-independence-in-eu-law\/","title":{"rendered":"MARCO FISICARO, The Krajowa Rada S\u0105downictwa judgment and the different faces of judicial independence in EU law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>ABSTRACT &#8211; For the first time, in the judgment <em>Krajowa Rada S\u0105downictwa, <\/em>the Court of Justice has declared inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling made by the Polish Supreme Court due to irregularities in the appointment procedure of the members of the panel adjudicating in the national proceeding. The case raises once again the delicate issue of defining the relations between the independence criterion as part of the notion of \u2018court or tribunal\u2019 under article 267 TFUE and the Court\u2019s case law on the principle of judicial independence based on articles 19 TEU and 47 of the Charter. This comment critically analyses the partial overlap between the different strands of the Court\u2019s case law on judicial independence, which lies at the basis of the judgment Krajowa Rada S\u0105downictwa, in light of the different functions performed by the independence requirement under articles 267 TFEU, 19 TEU and 47 of the Charter.   <\/p>\n\n\t\t<div class=\"wppdfemb-frame-container-1\" style=\"-webkit-overflow-scrolling:auto;\">\n\t\t\t<iframe class=\"pdfembed-iframe nonfullscreen wppdf-emb-iframe-1\"\n\t\t\t\tsrc=\"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/?pdfemb-data=eyJwZGZJRCI6MTAyMjU3LCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczpcL1wvd3d3LmFpc2R1ZS5ldVwvd3AtY29udGVudFwvdXBsb2Fkc1wvMjAyNFwvMDNcL0Zpc2ljYXJvLUJsb2dEVUUucGRmIiwidGl0bGUiOiJGaXNpY2Fyby1CbG9nRFVFIiwiaW5kZXgiOjEsIndtX3RleHQiOiIifQ\"\n\t\t\t\ttitle=\"Fisicaro-BlogDUE\"\t\t\t\tdata-pdf-id=\"102257\"\n\t\t\t\tdata-pdf-index=\"1\"\n\t\t\t\tstyle=\"border:none;width:100%;max-width:100%;height:100vh;\"\n\t\t\t\tscrolling=\"yes\">\n\t\t\t<\/iframe>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\n<p class=\"wp-block-pdfemb-pdf-embedder-viewer\"><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Fisicaro-BlogDUE.pdf\">DOWNLOAD IN FORMATO PDF<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT &#8211; For the first time, in the judgment Krajowa Rada S\u0105downictwa (Maintien en fonctions d\u2019un juge), the Court of Justice has declared inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling made by the Polish Supreme Court due to irregularities in the appointment procedure of the members of the panel adjudicating in the national proceeding. The case raises once again the delicate issue of defining the relations between the independence criterion as part of the notion of \u2018court or tribunal\u2019 under article 267 TFUE and the Court\u2019s case law on the principle of judicial independence based on articles 19 TEU and 47 of the Charter. This comment critically analyses the partial overlap between the different strands of the Court\u2019s case law on judicial independence, which lies at the basis of the judgment Krajowa Rada S\u0105downictwa, in light of the different functions performed by the independence requirement under articles 267 TFEU, 19 TEU and 47 of the Charter.    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":102272,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_piecal_is_event":false,"_piecal_start_date":"","_piecal_end_date":"","_piecal_is_allday":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1109],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogdue-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102260"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102260\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":102264,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102260\/revisions\/102264"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aisdue.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}